Thursday, September 4, 2014

THE ANSWER IS 44 (warning: Strategy and Enterprise Architecture used in the same sentence)



It used to be 90. Then, 70. A year ago, it was established at 44. While this is not the answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, and Everything, it’s still an important one: What percentage of business strategies fail?

A multitude of reasons and factors explain why strategies or transformational initiatives fail. For example, a long time ago Dr. Kotter found that shortcomings in defining and communicating a compelling vision, and mobilizing around the planning and implementation result in failure. More recently, Dr. Kaplan and Dr. Norton in their book Execution Premium, found that roughly 2/3 fail because a formal strategy execution process is missing. An Economist Intelligence Unit & PMI report from 2013 says the biggest barriers to successful strategy implementation are: The organization lacks change management skills, initiatives are poorly resourced, and the organization lacks project management skills. (They also found out it’s “44”.)

The recommendations from these studies urge  you to embrace a smarter and a more wholesome approach to the execution of strategy. Yet something is missing: a methodology that supports the connecting of strategy to the components of the execution. Let’s summarize from the learnings above and add the missing, connecting piece:

1. Adopt best practises. All of the proposed best practices and improvements are needed. Ensure your team cherishes competences and methods for communications and change management. No excuses allowed!

2. Get organized. For execution, a program office is needed as a mechanism of prioritization and implementation of projects. Also needed is a guiding process that integrates the typically separate corporate activities. This process should be clear to all parties from formulation to implementation.

3. Get systematic. A comprehensive approach needs to be supported by a methodology where things can be connected in a meaningful way: Enterprise Architecture. Yes, that thing that’s based on ancient cults of Zachman and TOGAF, and that uses a clandestine language of ArchiMate to explain, with a holy metamodel, how all things necessary in IT, business, and universe are connected. The novelty in EA is how you use it in a business outcome driven way. EA forces you to define strategy, and its goals with concrete targets. It can also provide transparency – an improved understanding of what can be achieved. Taking advantage of new technology can be enabled by using EA, and it also helps in closing the feedback loop on execution.

With these actions, I believe THE ANSWER will be improved. As my favorite aphorism goes: Current ways of working equal current results; New ways of working equal improved results.

Please comment: Did you already try it – what are your key learnings? What is you way of ensuring the implementation plans are aligned?

PS. Thanks to Gail Severini and others in Balanced Scorecard /Strategy Office Executives Linkedin group for throughly clarifying the topic.

Sami Lotvonen

1 comment:

  1. his process should be clear to all parties from formulation to implementation.
    Top web designing company

    ReplyDelete